What if I could show you how to buy dollars with pennies, would you be interested? If you or someone you know is 65 or older, this financial secret is something you certainly want to know about. There are people who are saving their individual retirement account (IRA) for a rainy day or an emergency. Believe it or not, these IRA accounts often are never spent by their owner. People who own these like the idea of having a nest egg to pass to their loved ones if they never need it during their lives.

The After 70 ½ Rule for Your Ira

One major financial setback of an Ira is that sometimes these accounts are taxed upwards of 50 percent when they pass it to their heirs. As people age, Uncle Sam gets greedier. For example, John is 71. He has a pension from his job and social security that covers all of the monthly expenses. He also has $75,000 sitting in an IRA. There is currently a tax code in place that makes it mandatory for John to take money out of his IRA account even if he has no need or desire to spend that money. This is true for anyone who is 70 ½ or older. Worse yet, John has to deduct money out of that account each and every year.

Uncle Sam Needs Your Money Even After You Retire

In case you are wondering why John is forced to take money out of his personal account, the government wants him and everyone else his age to take a distribution each year because individuals pay taxes on the money they withdraw. The reason why this occurs is because taxes are the fuel that runs the government engine. If there are millions of retirees withdrawing money, there are billions in tax revenue generated for the government. As you continue to read, there is a way to turn this “have to” money into “want to” money. In other words, you are going to learn how to look forward to putting a required minimum distribution to work for you.

How to Make Uncle Sam Work in Your Favor

You will most likely be shocked to find out that cash value life insurance is the answer. One reason why people shy away from life insurance is because the annual premiums are so high. This becomes the perfect scenario for a retirement account that has a required minimum distribution (RMD). Instead of John spending money from his (RMD) on unnecessary purchases, he can take that money and purchase a policy that will last for the rest of his life. Perhaps the best advantage is that the money passes to the beneficiary tax free.

Since the distribution is tax free, John has great flexibility with his IRA as long as he knows that he intends to save it for an emergency and pass it to his loved ones. If we compare John’s options side-by-side, it will be easy to conclude the decision that would be in John’s best benefit. If John keeps his money in his Ira, he will have to withdraw money from his account yearly. If the amount taken out is more than the interest earned the value of his Ira is going to decrease. When John dies, the entire amount left over will be taxed before his heirs receive the money. If John places his money in an insurance policy, he may end up spending all of his money down in his Ira as he transfers that money to his insurance policy on an annual basis. However, the difference is that if he purchases a $75,000 policy, the entire $75,000 plus any earned interest will pass to his heirs. If done properly, this strategy will always allow anyone to pass more money to their loved ones without any out-of-pocket expenses.

Obviously, every situation is unique. If you live in the greater Los Angeles area or the Inland Empire, please feel free to ask one of our experts if you need help to maximize the amount you pass to your loved ones, church, or even your favorite charity.

Simply put, if you have people who love you and depend on you financially, you need life insurance. This is a very difficult subject to talk about because very few people feel comfortable enough to talk about death. In fact, I was sitting down with a family in Fontana, CA and the spouse was driven to tears just thinking about losing her loved ones. Even though life insurance is not fun to discuss, that fact does not diminish the need to prepare for the inevitable.

Life Insurance Serves Many Purposes

Throughout your life you will experience different phases in which life insurance can fulfill a specific purpose. The following examples illustrate the various uses of life insurance.

Single People

People who are not married and have no kids do not typically consider life insurance as a need. However, if you are providing financial support for aging parents or siblings who lack the ability to care for themselves, you should consider life insurance. Unfortunately, some debt passes to your family members, but money from life insurance is not considered part of an estate so it is free of estate taxes.

Married Couples

After the 1950s, families needed dual incomes to get ahead financially. If a wife makes $50,000 a year and the husband makes the same, chances are the family is living at least a $100,000 lifestyle. If one spouse unexpectedly passed away, the family would suddenly have to survive on half the income. Funeral Expenses, plus all of the existing expenses such as credit card balances and outstanding loans that are still in both names still have to be paid.

Parenthood

Raising a child is sometimes the most difficult and rewarding challenge that parents will encounter. Baby formula, baby food, diapers, clothes, toys, and college are a few of the many expenses for parents regardless of socioeconomic status. The US Department of agriculture estimates that the average cost to raise each child is $235,000 (not including college). If your income suddenly stopped upon your death, would your spouse be able to provide your children with the same lifestyle that the two of you always dreamed about? How would you pay for their sports, dance, and college? If you are a single parent, how would your passing away impact your household?

Homeowners

The title of home ownership is a misnomer since a home cannot technically be owned until mortgage payments end. Life Insurance can be used to pay down partial or full mortgages. Some companies offer life insurance policies that equal the number of years remaining on a mortgage. For example, if a mortgage has 28 years left, some companies offer 28 year term life insurance policies. Besides the strictly practical use for life insurance, a family who receives a death benefit can also use the money to maintain their existing lifestyle.

Retirement

If the pitfalls of life never visited you during the early years, consider yourself lucky. Now that the kids have graduated and they have stable incomes, and your home is paid off, people have perhaps taught you that there was no longer a need for life insurance. That stated, what would happen if you died today? Would your spouse have enough money to maintain the same lifestyle for 10 to 20 yrs? Contrary to popular belief, this is the best time to have had life insurance with some cash savings. Structured properly, you can begin to live on the compounding interest that has accrued over the years. Term insurance during this phase of your life gives you peace-of-mind, and cash value life insurance gives you lifestyle. What is so great about insurance is that you can’t lose. It’s a fixed fight. If you die too soon, your family is going to benefit financially by maintaining their current standard of living. If you save and survive, you put yourself in a position to have more money to spend during retirement.

This blog post is the final post of a 7 part series on life insurance. You can find the first post here: http://www.your-insurance-experts.com/why-get-life-insurance-part-1/

The Real Power of Life Insurance Comes During Distribution

Now that Justin is ready to access the cash value in his policy, there are a number of options he can exercise. After maximum-funding a policy, the proper distribution of cash is the most important strategy. Since Justin is still living and his grown children have no need for life insurance, he could choose to surrender his policy. That would not be a wise choice because without an in-force life insurance contract, all of the gains in his cash value would be subject to taxes. In fact, that choice would have made this option worse than a tax-qualified plan like an IRA because Justin would have at least received the benefit of tax deferral.

Life insurance companies devised an ingenious provision that allows Justin to take out a loan based on the cash value in his policy. It is important to note that Justin will not borrow his own money. He will use the cash value in his policy as collateral. There is nothing particularly clever about taking out a loan and using something of value as collateral. What is inspiring to Justin is that he can take out his loan with no or little interest, and he will never have to pay the loan back.

Earlier, we stated that Justin was 35 and put in around $1,400 each month until he was 70, which equals $588,000 of cash value out of his pocket totaling around $2,000,000 of accumulated cash value in addition to the $500,000 he could pass to his heirs. Let’s assume that Justin is going to live on $100,000 a year during retirement. Justin could distribute or spend down his cash value in two phases.

Phase one – Justin could take a withdrawal of the money he put into his policy. Since he needs $100,000 a year to live on, it would take close to six years to withdraw his $588,000. After Justin has withdrawn the $588,000, there is a possibility that the $1,400,000 (the estimated result after you subtract $588,000 from $2,000,000) of growth could experience even more growth during the five years depending on market conditions.

Phase two – After Justin finishes withdrawing his out-of-pocket money, he could then take out a loan on the roughly $1,400,000 of cash value. The $100,000 a year would still come to Justin tax-free. The three most common purchases use a loan for are cars, homes, and student loans. We receive money to pay for these items, but we don’t owe any taxes on them, right? Instead, we pay interest to the lending institution. Similarly, the insurance company places Justin’s $100,000 into a separate account at a certain interest rate. What’s ingenious is that this $100,000 will also earn an interest rate during the year. If the interest rate is 5 percent and the $100,000 earns 4% in the separate account, then Justin’s net interest rate is only 1%. If the $100,000 earns 5% then Justin has a wash loan and doesn’t owe anything.

A logical question is, “This sounds too good to be true. Why doesn’t Justin have to pay back the loan?” Justin’s cash value is $2,000,000 and his death benefit is $500,000. For the sake of simplicity, let’s conservatively assume that the cash value doesn’t earn interest and the interest rate in the loan (say 5%) and the $100,000 in the separate account (5%) create a wash loan. If Justin lived until 86, (16 years in retirement at $100,000 a year is $1,600,000) he would have a $500,000 death benefit to pass to his heirs. At that time, the insurance company would deduct $1,600,000 from the $2,000,000 and his heirs would receive what was left over, which in this example, would be $400,000. Therefore, the total tax-free death benefit Justin’s heirs would receive is $900,000.

To summarize, Justin maximizes the amount he puts into his cash value life insurance policy with after tax money. His cash value grows over a long period of time. During his retirement years, he withdraws $100,000 a year tax-free until that money is gone. After he withdraws his money, he will then take a loan of $100,000 a year tax-free for the rest of his life. When Justin passes away, the death benefit and the remaining cash value will go to his beneficiaries without any tax liability. In other words, for delaying gratification for 35 years and contributing $588,000 in this example, Justin lived retirement on $1.6 million tax-free and still had almost a million tax-free dollars to pass to his heirs. I would say that it was good that Justin and his insurance agent met.

Now that you have the information, do not become a victim of procrastination. Contact an insurance expert in your local area who can sit down and discuss your individual situation (if you reside in the Southern California area, I will be happy to help you — my contact details are below). Whether you decide to make this a part of your retirement portfolio or not, take action now by making an informed decision. Your retirement future and the financial well-being of your family could depend on the steps you take today.

This blog post is a continuation of a 7 part series on life insurance. You can find the first post here: http://www.your-insurance-experts.com/why-get-life-insurance-part-1/

Using Life Insurance for Favorable Tax Treatment

If you had a dollar that doubled every year (100 percent gain) for twenty years, you would have $1,048,576, which would be fantastic. However, if that money was taxed each year at 30% you would have a meager $40,642. I am in agreement that we should all pay our fair share of taxes, but I also believe that we should make ourselves aware of ways to redirect our hard-earned money that favors us. Permanent cash value life insurance is a way to place large sums of cash, and if structured properly, receive the growth of that cash free of income taxes (based on current tax laws as of the time of this writing).

Perhaps you are wondering why you did not know about this, and how is it possible to have an increase of cash value without having to pay taxes. Firstly, it is important to understand that many insurance professionals only know insurance and many financial professionals only know finance. Utilizing cash value as an investment strategy within a life insurance policy combines two different professional industries in one product. As time passes, more professionals are starting to see the value of understanding both industries, but this process is still in the infancy stages.

The money you place in cash value life insurance has already been taxed by the time it enters your bank account. Because the money is a part of a life insurance policy, there is no tax liability on the growth as long as you stay within the funding limitations from the government. For example, Justin needs $500,000 of coverage. Depending upon policy variations from one insurance company to another, he could put around $1,400/mo. into his policy. At age 70, he could have around $2,000,000 even after the fees and cost of insurance. Additionally, he still has $500,000 to pass to his heirs. The best part of the $2,000,000 is that he has access to that money tax free!

You may have noticed the many disclaimers about having a properly structured cash value life insurance policy. To illustrate this point, a dragster racing car requires a special type of fuel and a properly structured racing course to get the maximum use out of that type of high performing vehicle. A specific combination of methanol and alcohol are used as fuel to help these cars to reach speeds in excess of 300 mph in less than 5 seconds. If I decided to fuel a dragster with unleaded 87 fuel, and drive it around the neighborhood, could I possibly get the maximum use from this vehicle? Absolutely not. Similarly, cash is the fuel and time is the course for this type of funding vehicle. Along these lines, someone with a cash value life insurance policy should put as much cash as the policy will allow for at least 20 years to accomplish the absolute best benefit. I would imagine that there is no exhilaration like going from 0 to 100 mph in less than a second. Likewise, having access to over a million tax-free dollars is a thrill like no other.

In the next blog post I will discuss how the Real Power in Cash Value Life Insurance comes during Distribution…

This blog post is a continuation of a 7 part series on life insurance. You can find the first post here: http://www.your-insurance-experts.com/why-get-life-insurance-part-1/

How to Outpace Inflation Using Life Insurance

There are lots of different types of investments that people use to outpace inflation. It’s reasonably safe to assume that every investor desires to sacrifice capital now for a greater amount of capital in the future. The difference is how people plan to get the greatest return on their investment given their ability to tolerate risk. Some like stocks, bonds, or mutual funds. Each one of these investment vehicles have the potential to have very competitive gains. However, the downside is the risk to lose the gains in a down year.

When your money is in a market that can lose investment capital, you might be surprised how long it takes to recover from the losses. For example, let’s assume you are aggressive, and you decide to take some market risks for potentially attractive gains. You invest $100,000, but the market goes in the wrong direction and you lose 50% of your portfolio. Looking at the math, the value of your portfolio is now $50,000. During the following year, the market recovers and goes back up by 50%, how much do you have in your portfolio? If you answered $100,000, your response was the same as 75% of the people in which we ask this question. The correct answer is $75,000 because 50% of 50,000 is $25,000. This exercise is not meant to be a tricky math lesson, but more of a way to illustrate that losing your money to market loss is dangerous because it takes two-percent of an increase to recapture every one-percent loss.

The cash you place inside of permanent life insurance depends on how you prefer to combat inflation. One approach is to place the cash value directly in the market. With this strategy, you can participate in all of the gains that the market has to offer, but you also participate in all of the losses from the market. Someone who has a high risk tolerance may choose this approach if they have the discipline to think long-term and the discipline not to react emotionally when the market conditions are temporarily unfavorable. As stated before, a one-percent loss creates the need for a two-percent gain.

Another strategy that you can use is an equity indexed life insurance approach. In this case, the money you earn is not actually in the stock market so it is not subject to the losses. In other words, when the stock market has a positive year, your cash value will experience a gain up to a percentage that each insurance company determines. That “cap” rate is typically around 10 percent; some companies are slightly higher and some are slightly lower. If the market gains more than the cap, you will earn what the cap rate allows. If the market, however, experiences a loss during a year, you will not risk any of your principle due to market loss. This strategy is for a moderately conservative person who is willing to forego some of the market gains to eliminate the market losses.

In the next blog post, I will explore how to use Life Insurance to Save on Taxes. 

I recently sat down with a newlywed couple in Rancho Cucamonga who wanted to know if it made sense to increase the amount of life insurance coverage to achieve their overall financial goals. They each showed me a policy that they purchased a number of years ago. I was surprised to see that each of them was paying about 30 percent too much for their coverage. Similar to gas stations and grocery stores, you will find cost variation, but 30 percent is too much of a difference. People work hard for their money and therefore, deserve to save it, spend it, or invest it. Here are some ways to suspect that you are overpaying.

Know about mortality trends

There are secrets about the insurance industry that everyone should know to ensure they have the best possible policy. This particular secret could potentially impact every person who owns a small term policy to a multi-million dollar permanent policy that is accumulating tax-free retirement income, and every policy between.

Life Insurance companies pay large sums of money to know to the greatest level of certainty the lifespan of males and females. Prior to strict legislation that held insurance companies more accountable, a small number of those companies unscrupulously overcharged their clients to pad their profits. In response to this act of greed, the industry developed a standardized pricing system for life insurance in 1958. This system was called the Commissioners Standard Ordinary Mortality Rates (typically referred to as CSO).

During the 50s people had shorter lifespans. This fact is important for insurance companies for obvious reasons. Consequently, people who purchased life insurance policies during that era had to pay a higher amount for their insurance.  Another mortality study was done in 1980 to reflect the changes in life expectancy. The most recent mortality study was conducted in 2001 which revealed that people were living even longer than the people in 1980. The CSO table in 2001 reflects a 30 percent reduction in the cost of insurance compared to the table in 1980.

A reduction of 30 percent means that you can purchase $130,000 of life insurance for the price of $100,000 or you can pay $70 for the same amount of insurance instead of $100. If you have the right kind of policy, you could take the extra $30 and use it for tax advantaged cash value accumulation.

Secrets of some Insurance companies

Every industry needs an agency to regulate unethical practices. Devoid of such an agency, a small number of individuals inevitably fail to resist the temptation to amass more profits. The same is true in the insurance industry. Specifically, the 1980 CSO tables were not enforced until 1989. To properly put this into perspective, let’s assume you are a business owner and you find out that a new procedure takes effect next January that will reduce your profits by 30%, but you are not forced to implement the procedure. How quickly would you integrate that practice into your business? Chances are you probably would not be in too much of a rush, would you? Neither were companies in the insurance industry.

Know how this secret impacts you

It’s January 1986 and you just made a New Year’s resolution to lose weight. On the 28^th you see the Space Shuttle Challenger explode on television, which prompts you to protect your life against some unforeseen accident. If you purchased a life insurance policy in 1986, chances are the prices you paid was based on CSO table of 1958, nearly 30 years earlier. If you knew this secret, it would have saved you a ton of money because the rates in the late 50s cost 40 percent more.

In other words, if you invested $100 a month earning 6 percent annually for 30 years, you would have $94,869.82. If you invested $140 a month (40 percent more) earning 6 percent annually for 30 years, you would have $132,817.75 or $37,947.93 more.

Everyone knows they need life insurance, but the essential question is, are you overpaying for yours? I encourage you to look at your policy issue date to see if that is possible. Secondly, you might consider having a local insurance expert examine your policy. You may be leaving lots of money on the table that could benefit you greatly.